Reading an AI verdict
Understand the fields on an AI verdict card (signal, confidence, horizon, levels, consensus) and the limits of this kind of analysis.
The essentials
An AI verdict is a summary generated automatically from the technical indicators the application already computes. It appears as a card with several fields that are meant to be read in a specific order.
- Signal: bullish, bearish, or neutral. This is the trend the model believes it has identified.
- Confidence: low, medium, or high. It reflects how strongly the underlying signals agree with each other, not the probability that price will actually move that way.
- Horizon: the time frame the verdict is meant to apply to (for example short term or medium term). The same asset can carry a bullish short-term verdict and a neutral medium-term one at the same time.
- Support and resistance: reference price levels below and above the current price that could slow down or accelerate a move.
On the Pro plan, the card also shows a consensus: how closely the three AI providers queried in parallel agree with each other. A strong consensus means the three independent analyses converge on the same conclusion.
Going further: weighing multiple verdicts
If you look at verdicts across several assets or several horizons, do not treat them in isolation. When several AI providers (visible through the Pro consensus) or several horizons point in the same direction, that raises the confidence you can place in the overall signal.
- Agreement across providers or horizons: the signal is more robust, but it remains an algorithmic opinion.
- Disagreement across providers or horizons: this is a signal to be cautious. It points to an ambiguous situation where it is better to reduce exposure or wait for confirmation than to force a decision.
Expert: a second opinion, not an oracle
The verdict is produced by a language model from the same technical indicators you can read yourself in the analysis panel (RSI, MACD, moving averages, Bollinger Bands, the confluence score). The model has no additional information: it restates and weighs that same data.
Treat it as a second opinion, never as ground truth. Systematically cross-check it against the asset's confluence score and against your own risk management, including the position size and exit levels you defined before reading the verdict.